{"id":10417,"date":"2023-08-10T17:34:11","date_gmt":"2023-08-10T17:34:11","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/nft.runfyers.com\/index.php\/2023\/08\/10\/epic-games-vs-apple-the-court-battle-continues-nft-news-today\/"},"modified":"2023-08-10T17:34:11","modified_gmt":"2023-08-10T17:34:11","slug":"epic-games-vs-apple-the-court-battle-continues-nft-news-today","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/nft.runfyers.com\/index.php\/2023\/08\/10\/epic-games-vs-apple-the-court-battle-continues-nft-news-today\/","title":{"rendered":"Epic Games vs Apple: The Court Battle Continues – NFT News Today"},"content":{"rendered":"

<\/p>\n

\n

The U.S. Supreme Court has delivered a blow to Epic Games<\/a>, the creators of the widely-played video game \u201cFortnite,\u201d by not allowing a federal judge\u2019s injunction to be implemented. The postponement allows Apple the opportunity to appeal the decision to the Supreme Court. During this interim, Apple can maintain its existing App Store guidelines, which prevent iOS apps from providing users with details or links to outside payment systems or marketplaces, meaning Web3 and NFT applications will need to hold off for now.<\/p>\n

Background on the Epic Games vs Apple Conflict<\/h2>\n

In 2020, the makers of the popular game \u201cFortnite\u201d, Epic Games, filed an antitrust lawsuit against Apple. The core contention revolved around Apple\u2019s policies<\/a> concerning its App Store and the commission it charges, which can go up to 30%. The crux of the disagreement was Apple\u2019s mandate that consumers acquire apps exclusively from its App Store and make digital purchases within these apps through its system.<\/p>\n

\n
\n
\n

Not surprisingly, the Supreme Court (by decision of Justice Kagan, who is the SCOTUS judge to whom such 9th Cir. matters are assigned) denied Epic Games’ motion to enforce the injunction it won in district court 2 years ago.<\/p>\n

Epic was right; legal standard favored Apple.<\/p>\n

\ud83e\uddf51\/3 pic.twitter.com\/UnpnphgapG<\/a><\/p>\n

\u2014 Florian Mueller (@FOSSpatents) August 9, 2023<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<\/div>\n<\/figure>\n

While Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers turned down Epic\u2019s antitrust allegations against Apple in 2021, she ruled<\/a> that Apple transgressed California\u2019s unfair competition laws. Specifically, Apple\u2019s policy prohibiting developers from \u201csteering\u201d users to alternative digital purchasing methods, which could potentially save them money, was pinpointed as unfair. The consequential injunction mandated Apple to allow developers to include links and buttons directing users to alternate payment systems within their apps<\/p>\n

The San Francisco-based 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals played a critical role by initially upholding the injunction. However, this decision was temporarily halted in July. Fast forward to recent events, and the U.S. Supreme Court, represented by Justice Elena Kagan, declined to override the 9th Circuit\u2019s decision to suspend the injunction.<\/p>\n

This means that, for the moment, the judicial system has allowed Apple\u2019s existing regulations to persist. Apple argued that enforcing the injunction would oblige it to alter its business model, potentially compromising user protection against potential threats like fraud, scams, and malware. On the other hand, Epic\u2019s stance was that the 9th Circuit\u2019s criteria for postponing injunctions are too permissive.<\/p>\n

What Does This Mean for NFTs, Web3 Gaming, and Apple?<\/h2>\n

In June, leading web3 game developer and publisher, Immutable Games, revealed<\/a> that Gods Unchained, Ethereum\u2019s top-selling trading card game, debuted on the Epic Games Store. This news undoubtedly sent waves of excitement throughout the Web3 gaming community.<\/p>\n

Apple\u2019s AppStore guidelines have frequently faced criticism for hindering Web3 entities. Apple enforces regulations on its platform to shield iOS users from the financial uncertainties inherent in virtual assets such as cryptocurrencies and NFTs.<\/p>\n

Currently, mobile games employing NFTs and cryptocurrency tokens won\u2019t be able to guide users to external marketplaces because of Apple\u2019s prevailing rules. Were the Supreme Court to ultimately favour Epic, a new horizon could emerge where apps can link users to external NFT platforms, bypassing Apple\u2019s 30% commission.<\/p>\n

Given these constraints on Apple\u2019s ecosystem, gamers might have to look elsewhere to enjoy a comprehensive NFT gaming experience<\/a>. The Play Store by Google or the expanding range of blockchain games hosted by Epic Games might become more enticing platforms for such endeavours.<\/p>\n

Conclusion<\/h2>\n

The ongoing tussle between Epic Games and Apple is emblematic of broader shifts and challenges in the digital domain, especially as NFTs and Web3 gaming become more mainstream. As legal decisions unfold, they will undeniably shape how developers, platforms, and gamers interact in this new digital frontier. For now, the gaming community awaits the Supreme Court\u2019s final stance.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n