{"id":23880,"date":"2026-04-23T12:25:57","date_gmt":"2026-04-23T12:25:57","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/nft.runfyers.com\/index.php\/2026\/04\/23\/coinbase-flags-proof-of-stake-chains-like-ethereum-solana-as-potential-quantum-risks\/"},"modified":"2026-04-23T12:25:57","modified_gmt":"2026-04-23T12:25:57","slug":"coinbase-flags-proof-of-stake-chains-like-ethereum-solana-as-potential-quantum-risks","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/nft.runfyers.com\/index.php\/2026\/04\/23\/coinbase-flags-proof-of-stake-chains-like-ethereum-solana-as-potential-quantum-risks\/","title":{"rendered":"Coinbase Flags Proof-of-Stake Chains Like Ethereum, Solana as Potential Quantum Risks"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><\/p>\n<div>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Coinbase warns that Proof-of-Stake blockchains like Ethereumn (ETH) and Solana (SOL) could face risks from quantum computers in the future, following the announcement of the first report from an independent quantum advisory board on April 22.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The report, conducted with researchers from Stanford, UT Austin, and the Ethereum Foundation, emphasizes that crypto remains safe from quantum for now, but preparation needs to start immediately before the threat becomes urgent \u2014 especially as the security structures of many blockchains could be affected if quantum computing capabilities reach a sufficiently strong threshold.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Coinbase_Flags_Quantum_Risks_for_PoS\"\/><b>Coinbase Flags Quantum Risks for PoS<\/b><span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"\/><\/h3>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Coinbase is not issuing an \u201cimminent threat\u201d style warning, but framing the issue in a long-term context. In a recent post, Philip Martin, Coinbase CSO, emphasized that \u201ccrypto is safe today,\u201d while noting that the industry needs to prepare before sufficiently powerful quantum systems emerge.<\/span><\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"twitter-tweet\" data-width=\"500\" data-dnt=\"true\">\n<p lang=\"en\" dir=\"ltr\">Today we&#8217;ve published the first position paper from the Coinbase Independent Advisory Board on Quantum Computing and Blockchain, a group of leading researchers from Stanford, UT Austin, the Ethereum Foundation, and beyond.<\/p>\n<p>The short version: your crypto is safe today. But a\u2026<\/p>\n<p>\u2014 Philip Martin (@SecurityGuyPhil) <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/SecurityGuyPhil\/status\/2046654547737837569?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\" data-wpel-link=\"external\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow external noopener noreferrer\">April 21, 2026<\/a><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">This is the first report from the independent quantum advisory board established by Coinbase, with participation from researchers at academic institutions and the Ethereum Foundation. According to Coinbase, the group\u2019s goal is to assess potential risks to current cryptographic systems and propose long-term preparation directions for the industry.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Research indicates that risk levels may vary between systems. Some blockchain protocols \u2014 especially Proof-of-Stake \u2014 may have a higher level of \u201cexposure,\u201d as the way public keys are used in the staking and validation process can increase exposure in certain attack scenarios.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Why_PoS_Faces_Higher_Exposure\"\/><b>Why PoS Faces Higher Exposure<\/b><span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"\/><\/h3>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Unlike Proof-of-Work, where public keys are usually only exposed when a transaction is performed, Proof-of-Stake protocols require validators to maintain their public keys in a public state for long periods to participate in the validation process.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">This makes validators on PoS easier targets in a quantum computer attack scenario. If a sufficiently powerful quantum computer can derive a private key from a public key \u2014 an assumption related to the ability to break elliptic curve cryptography (ECDSA) \u2014 then the validator could become a direct target.<\/span><\/p>\n<div id=\"attachment_96695\" style=\"width: 4010px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><noscript><\/noscript><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-96695\" class=\"lazyload size-full wp-image-96695\" src=\"https:\/\/nftplazas.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/Ethereum-Total-Value-Staked.jpg\" alt=\"Ethereum total value staked\" width=\"4000\" height=\"2250\"\/><\/p>\n<p id=\"caption-attachment-96695\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Ethereum total value staked. Source: CryptoQuant<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Ethereum is currently the largest PoS network. About <strong>32.3%<\/strong> of the total ETH supply is being staked, equivalent to about 39 million ETH, with a total staking market cap of around 94.4 billion USD. This means a significant portion of assets in the ecosystem depends on the security of validator keys.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">On Solana, the risk level may be higher. About <strong>68%<\/strong> of the total SOL supply is being staked, with a staking market cap of approximately 37.9 billion USD. As the stake ratio increases, the risk does not stop at individual accounts but could affect the entire PoS system if validators are compromised.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"How_Real_Is_the_Threat_Today\"\/><b>How Real Is the Threat Today<\/b><span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"\/><\/h3>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Both Coinbase and related studies emphasize that this risk is not yet immediate. Currently, there does not exist a cryptographically relevant quantum computer (CRQC) powerful enough to break encryption systems like ECDSA in real-world conditions.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">A recent study from <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/nftevening.com\/9-minutes-crack-bitcoin-wallet-how-real-quantum-threat\/\" data-wpel-link=\"internal\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Google Quantum AI <\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">shows that under ideal conditions, a quantum system could derive a private key from a public key in just minutes \u2014 equivalent to the time it takes to create a Bitcoin block \u2014 opening an \u201con-spend attack\u201d scenario where transactions could be replaced before they are confirmed.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">However, this is still a theoretical model. Current quantum systems have not reached the necessary scale, and implementing a real-world attack still faces many technical hurdles. Therefore, the issue does not lie in the present, but in the fact that blockchain systems need to prepare before this threat computing becomes feasible. This is also why Coinbase emphasizes \u201c<strong>prepare now, not when it\u2019s urgent.<\/strong>\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Impact_on_Users\"\/><b>Impact on Users<\/b><span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"\/><\/h3>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">For regular users, the risk of being affected in the short term is very low, especially if using modern address standards where public keys are not exposed before a transaction.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Impact_on_Validators_and_Networks\"\/><b>Impact on Validators and Networks<\/b><span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"\/><\/h3>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">For validators \u2014 especially on PoS networks \u2014 long-term exposure of public keys on the network makes them more vulnerable targets if a quantum attack becomes a reality.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">At the systemic level, the potential risk is even greater. On Ethereum, controlling more than 1\/3 of the stake can disrupt the finalization process; if it exceeds 2\/3, an attacker can control the entire consensus mechanism. This turns a cryptography issue into a systemic risk.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"How_Ethereum_and_Solana_Are_Preparing\"\/><b>How Ethereum and Solana Are Preparing<\/b><span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"\/><\/h3>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Major blockchains like Ethereum and Solana are still in the research and testing phase for response options to quantum computer risks, rather than deploying network-wide changes.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">According to the Coinbase report, from user accounts to validators and zk (zero-knowledge) systems, many parts of Ethereum could be affected if quantum becomes feasible. Previously, Vitalik Buterin also mentioned a \u201c<\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/ethresear.ch\/t\/how-to-hard-fork-to-save-most-users-funds-in-a-quantum-emergency\/18901\" data-wpel-link=\"external\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow external noopener noreferrer\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">quantum emergency<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u201d scenario, in which the network might need a hard fork to protect user funds. However, directions such as hash-based signatures or account abstraction still remain at the level of technical proposals.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">For Solana, the network has introduced \u201c<strong>Winternitz Vault<\/strong>,\u201d allowing users to transfer assets to addresses using hash-based signatures. After the transfer, these assets are no longer vulnerable to quantum computer attacks.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"A_Long-Term_Risk_Not_Immediate\"\/><b>A Long-Term Risk, Not Immediate<\/b><span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"\/><\/h3>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The warning from Coinbase is not a signal for an impending crisis, but a long-term risk to the security foundation of crypto.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">For Proof-of-Stake networks like Ethereum and Solana, where validators directly participate in the validation process, transitioning to quantum-resistant systems may be more complex due to consensus mechanisms and the amount of assets being staked.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Instead of reacting after an incident occurs, organizations like Coinbase are trying to accelerate preparation in advance. As the gap between theory and reality narrows, the transition may need to take place before the threat truly emerges.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p><script async src=\"\/\/platform.twitter.com\/widgets.js\" charset=\"utf-8\"><\/script><br \/>\n<br \/><a href=\"https:\/\/nftevening.com\/coinbase-flags-proof-of-stake-chains-ethereum-solana-quantum-risks\/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=coinbase-flags-proof-of-stake-chains-ethereum-solana-quantum-risks\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Source link <\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Coinbase warns that Proof-of-Stake blockchains like Ethereumn (ETH) and Solana (SOL) could face risks from quantum computers in the future, following the announcement of the first report from an independent quantum advisory board on April 22. The report, conducted with researchers from Stanford, UT Austin, and the Ethereum Foundation, emphasizes that crypto remains safe from [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":23881,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_is_tweetstorm":false,"jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true},"categories":[9],"tags":[21],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/nftevening.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/2204.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/nft.runfyers.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/23880"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/nft.runfyers.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/nft.runfyers.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nft.runfyers.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nft.runfyers.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=23880"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/nft.runfyers.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/23880\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nft.runfyers.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/23881"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/nft.runfyers.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=23880"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nft.runfyers.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=23880"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nft.runfyers.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=23880"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}